Working with AI-written docs · 2 min
Specify approved inputs, prohibited actions, evidence requirements, and output format before using a separate AI tool to draft repository documentation.
Read guide ↗: Write a read-only AI documentation prompt with explicit boundariesWorking with AI-written docs · 2 min
Track generated claims against source locations, revisions, confidence, and reviewer decisions so unsupported statements do not disappear into polished prose.
Read guide ↗: Build an evidence ledger for AI-generated documentationWorking with AI-written docs · 2 min
Check generated endpoint names, parameters, defaults, errors, and authorization statements against a versioned API contract and source evidence.
Read guide ↗: Verify AI-generated API documentation against the actual contractWorking with AI-written docs · 2 min
Check generated architecture diagrams against source evidence, ownership boundaries, direction labels, and a text explanation before sharing them.
Read guide ↗: Review AI-generated architecture diagrams for invented relationshipsWorking with AI-written docs · 2 min
Review generated snippets for real APIs, version assumptions, side effects, placeholders, and reproducible validation before readers copy them.
Read guide ↗: Verify AI-generated documentation code examples before publicationWorking with AI-written docs · 2 min
Prevent stale generated guidance by recording repository revisions, dependency versions, source dates, and the limits of each review.
Read guide ↗: Date and version the sources behind AI-generated documentationWorking with AI-written docs · 2 min
Replace vague confidence language with explicit evidence, bounded inferences, unknowns, and the next question a maintainer can answer.
Read guide ↗: Label uncertainty in AI-generated documentation without losing usefulnessWorking with AI-written docs · 2 min
Handle disagreements between code, tests, contracts, and existing docs by recording scope and ownership instead of letting an AI draft choose silently.
Read guide ↗: Resolve conflicting sources in an AI documentation draftWorking with AI-written docs · 2 min
Prepare minimal, approved source excerpts with synthetic examples and clear redaction notes before using a separate AI tool for documentation.
Read guide ↗: Redact repository evidence before sending it to an AI documentation toolWorking with AI-written docs · 2 min
Keep repository comments, fetched pages, and embedded instructions in the evidence role when an AI tool helps draft technical documentation.
Read guide ↗: Review documentation inputs for prompt-injection attemptsWorking with AI-written docs · 2 min
Regenerate only the affected explanation, preserve verified context, and review a semantic diff when code changes invalidate part of a document.
Read guide ↗: Update AI-assisted documentation after a focused code changeWorking with AI-written docs · 2 min
Build a reliable glossary by tying domain terms to usage, distinguishing overloaded names, and resisting definitions inferred only from identifiers.
Read guide ↗: Review an AI-generated project glossary for overloaded termsWorking with AI-written docs · 2 min
Verify that generated release notes describe shipped changes, affected users, and required actions without exposing internal material or overstating benefits.
Read guide ↗: Review AI-generated release notes against shipped behaviorWorking with AI-written docs · 2 min
Check generated setup instructions for declared versions, missing access prerequisites, observable checkpoints, and a realistic first task.
Read guide ↗: Review an AI-generated onboarding guide with a clean-environment checklistWorking with AI-written docs · 2 min
Review factual claims, examples, privacy, accessibility, revision scope, and rendering before committing an AI-assisted guide for readers.
Read guide ↗: Publication checklist for an AI-assisted HTML guide